They called it an “inter-faith” dailogue. Inter-faith? On the one hand there were church leaders, who apparently represent Christianity, and on the other hand there was the Sangh Parivar. Which faith do they represent? Hinduism? Most of my Hindu friends would feel insulted if I ever told them that Sangh Parivar represented Hinduism. But, I guess for the church leaders in Kerala that did not matter.
During this “inter-faith” dailogoue, church leaders and the Sangh Parivar resolved to thrash out their differences, have mutual respect for each other’s religious beliefs, prevent forced conversions while upholding the right of individuals to embrace the faith of their conviction and work towards “communal harmony”. Most interestingly, they even asked the believers to be beware of the machinations of politicians who are “out to take advantage of religious sentiments and to instigate communal passions.” I wonder which politicians were being refered to here. Surely, they were not pointing their fingers at themselves. They are all too self-righteous for that.
According to Archbishop Baselios Cleemis, head of the Malankara Catholic Church, the attacks that have been going on in the country for the last few months are not attacks on the Christian community but on persons bearing Christian names. Following the “inter-faith” dialogue, he loudly proclaimed that “an attack on a person bearing a Christian name need not be construed as an attack on the entire Christian community”. In other words, Christians should not panic over the recent spate of violence against them, those are just an attack on persons bearing Christian names. The representatives of the RSS, VHP and Hindu Aikya Vedi present at the meeting could not agree with him more.
At the core of this nefarious alliance is the common interests that the Church leaders in Kerala share with the Sangh Parivar, namely preserving the status quo and resisting any progressive change. Till very recently, these same church leaders were in the forefront fighting for their right to educate the rich and the affluent and not educate the poor. When the government told them that even the poor needs education, they shamelessly proclaimed that it was not their responsibility. Needless to say, Christ went through another Good Friday on that day. Similarly, when the left government brought out new social science school text books as per the guidelines set by the National Curriculum Framework, these same church leaders were in the forefront defending caste and tradition. They wanted chapters that critically discussed caste and communalism removed from the text book altogether. In all this, it is needless to say, they had the tacit support of those who, today, they sit with and talk about “communal harmony”.
As a Christian, I often wonder what Christ would have done in a situation like this. Would he have again taken that whip and driven out all those who had turned the house of prayer into a den of thievery? Would he have ranted at these ‘high priests’ and ‘Pharisees’ of today and exposed their hypocrisy? Would he have called them a “brood of vipers” or “wolves in sheep’s clothing” as he once called Pharisees? I think he would have.